A.I. as a Thinking Tool

I have become more amenable to the reasons why A.I. should exist.

The reasons why are as follows.

In this blog post I will try to convince readers that A.I. is helpful to humanity. Indeed, I have called out A.I. in the past. And, perhaps I will continue calling it out in certain aspects. But I find that A.I. is indeed quite helpful to humanity.

Indeed it has been said by many that A.I. poses an “existential threat.” But I will dismiss that outright. I don’t think it does. People should be more concerned with how they can use A.I. to their benefit than how A.I. poses an existential threat, in my opinion. A.I. can help people become more productive, for example.

And no, no company is paying me to say all this positive stuff about A.I. I have come to realize it myself.

Even deeper and more profoundly, I have found a very compelling reason to use A.I. I mean generative A.I. This compelling reason has to do with a book I read a few years ago about the power of asking questions. I think just this about A.I. – you can ask it literally anything you want. This of course is governed by the policies these generative A.I. companies have laid out, of course. You’re not going to ask A.I. what someone’s social security number is and expect that it is going to tell you that.

What I have found about A.I. however, more profoundly still, is that it can assist human beings in thinking more clearly. This is all deep stuff, but I find that if I ask A.I. something, and perhaps it will give me a general answer, but I will think more deeply about that subject. This is how A.I. is shaping my life during these days.

I hope to find better solutions for business problems, in other words, for my translation business, among other answers from A.I. Or better said, I hope to utilize A.I. in the future and now to generate better responses to humanistic problems. This is a radical shift from what I used to think about A.I. But I realized I was being quite cynical about it. I was a grumpy guy. But anyway, I have come to realize and learn that A.I. can be quite useful, especially in the ways I have mentioned, and I am sure it is useful to many other people in a myriad of ways.

The most intriguing thing about A.I. in my opinion is that it can literally help engineer your thinking around a certain subject. Okay, maybe that sounds too profound for now: I get it. It sounds out of this world. But A.I., if understood in the right, moral, correct way, can truly help people (mostly individuals), to think in clearer, more profound ways. And here’s how I’m going to get to the more philosophically juicy part of this entry: you can literally ask A.I. a question every day, and you will become smarter. How? Because A.I. will give you a different answer. And this simple act of prompting the A.I., this simple action, will make you think about things in a different way. I am not even talking about the A.I. “giving” you or “transmitting” information to you. That I think is hogwash. However, if you are to really think about it, and philosophically consider the implications of asking an artificial intelligence module what you are questioning most, it will most likely help you in your thought process. I have yet to prove this. It is just a thought that has been running around my head that I’d love to capture. And I think I’ve done just that in my post.

AI [A.I.] Again

If you type AI like the way I typed it in the title, perhaps people think it’s AL (Al), so I’m going to call it A.I. out of convention. I am not talking about the name AL (put here in all caps for emphasis), but rather, I am discussing the technogical and societal phenomenon of A.I. Artificial Intelligence is what it stands for, and I’m sure you’ve seen it in the news so this paragraph was probably entirely unnecessary.

I have always said A.I. has always existed, virtually. It’s almost as if people forget that tools exist. There’s all this hype about A.I., and people forget that hammers and screwdrivers exist. I suppose people get hyped up about the latest technological breakthrough, perhaps, and they think it’ll either (a) make them a lot of money or (b) lose them a lot of money. I think that may be what it comes down to in this case.

As a translator, I fall more into camp (b), but let me explain something. I am not that afraid of A.I. And before you think, “this guy is insane,” let me explain myself.

In a certain way A.I. is anything created by mankind that aids in any way. So, I don’t think my hammer and screwdriver examples were too far off the mark. Yet I am not even arguing for an integration of A.I. as it’s commonly known in the media (although one could easily debate about whether there are multiple significances of A.I. in the media). I think A.I. is not only something entirely different than what it is commonly thought to be, but also that it is not to be feared at all.

Imagine this with a rational, cool-headed mind: you are contracted to do a job as a laborer on a house. You have the choice of using a hammer to nail nails into the framing of a house, or you have the other option of trying to place them in manually, with your hands only. This is a bit of the problem I wanted to discuss. Which are you going to pick? I hope you picked the hammer.

The A.I. problem is a bit more complex, as it involves data structures and what not.

But think of it this way: any tool that man creates can be manipulated for his best use. So that is one of the key reasons I feel that A.I. is not to be feared.

Another reason A.I. is not to be feared is that it will not reckon with the human mind. I don’t mean that A.I. can’t be “smart.” I mean that A.I. is precisely nonhuman. Therefore, it is not to be feared that it will “take over humanity” or something of the like. Maybe I exaggerate, but maybe it serves a function in this text. Imagine the hammer taking over society. When the hammer was invented, did it severely affect humankind’s ability to do what humans do? I don’t really imagine so. I think the same is true of A.I.

There seems to be no impending doom from A.I., therefore.

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑